Supacrawler vs Selenium

Selenium is the most popular browser automation framework, originally designed for testing web applications. We benchmarked it against Supacrawler for JavaScript-heavy web scraping tasks.

Key Differences

Selenium excels at browser automation and testing but has significant overhead for scraping. Supacrawler is purpose-built for high-performance data extraction with Go-based streaming architecture.

Test Environment: Mac M4, 24GB RAM, Python 3.11, JavaScript rendering enabled (render_js=True), identical retry logic (3 retries, exponential backoff), 10s timeouts.

Performance Benchmarks

Single Page Performance (https://supabase.com with JavaScript):

ToolTimeBrowser ManagementArchitectureResource Usage
Selenium4.08sLocal ChromePython sequentialHigh CPU/Memory
Supacrawler1.37sCloud managedGo concurrentZero local

Supacrawler is 3.0x faster despite identical JavaScript rendering.

Multi-Page Crawling Performance:

Test TypeSupacrawlerSeleniumPerformance Gain
Single Page1.37s4.08s3.0x faster
10 Pages2.05s (0.20s/page)42.11s (4.21s/page)20.6x faster
50 Pages (avg)0.77s/page6.02s/page7.8x faster

Large-Scale Testing (50 pages per site):

WebsiteSeleniumSupacrawlerPerformance Gain
supabase.com4.83s/page0.73s/page6.7x faster
docs.python.org4.13s/page0.83s/page5.0x faster
ai.google.dev9.11s/page0.74s/page12.2x faster

Technical Architecture Comparison

Selenium Sequential Processing:

# One URL at a time - sequential bottleneck
for url in urls:
    driver.get(url)      # Block until complete
    extract_data()       # Process sequentially
    # Move to next URL

Supacrawler Go Streaming:

// Concurrent worker pool with goroutines
maxWorkers := 10  // Dynamic based on workload
for i := 0; i < maxWorkers; i++ {
    go worker()  // Parallel processing
}
// Stream results as they complete

Performance Advantages:

  • Go Concurrency: Goroutines vs Python sequential execution
  • Streaming Architecture: Process results as they arrive vs batch processing
  • Memory Efficiency: Go's optimized memory model vs Python/Chrome overhead
  • Infrastructure: Managed cloud browsers vs local browser management

The Content Quality Trade-off

Selenium Raw Output:

Supabase | The Postgres Development Platform. Product Developers 
Solutions Pricing Docs Blog 88.3K Sign in Start your project...

Supacrawler LLM-Ready Output:

# Build in a weekend, Scale to millions

Supabase is the Postgres development platform.

Start your project with a Postgres database, Authentication...

Supacrawler automatically removes navigation, ads, and boilerplate while preserving structured content in clean markdown format - faster than Selenium while delivering higher data quality.

Use Cases

TaskSeleniumSupacrawler
UI Testing✅ Excellent❌ Not designed for this
Form Interactions✅ Full control❌ Not supported
Web Scraping⚠️ Complex setup✅ Purpose-built
LLM Data Extraction⚠️ Raw HTML output✅ Clean markdown
JavaScript Sites✅ Full support✅ Optimized rendering
Browser Management❌ Manual setup required✅ Zero maintenance
Scalability⚠️ Resource intensive✅ Auto-scaling
Performance⚠️ Sequential bottleneck✅ Concurrent processing

Setup Complexity

Selenium Setup:

  1. Install browser drivers
  2. Manage Chrome/Firefox versions
  3. Configure headless options
  4. Handle browser crashes
  5. Implement retry logic
  6. Scale infrastructure

Supacrawler Setup:

  1. Get API key
  2. pip install supacrawler
  3. Start scraping

Getting Started

Selenium: Install drivers → Configure browsers → Write retry logic → Handle crashes → Scale infrastructure → Clean data manually

Supacrawler: Get API keypip install supacrawler → Start getting clean data immediately

See detailed benchmarks: Supacrawler vs Selenium Performance Analysis

Was this page helpful?