Supacrawler vs Selenium
Selenium is the most popular browser automation framework, originally designed for testing web applications. We benchmarked it against Supacrawler for JavaScript-heavy web scraping tasks.
Key Differences
Selenium excels at browser automation and testing but has significant overhead for scraping. Supacrawler is purpose-built for high-performance data extraction with Go-based streaming architecture.
Test Environment: Mac M4, 24GB RAM, Python 3.11, JavaScript rendering enabled (render_js=True
), identical retry logic (3 retries, exponential backoff), 10s timeouts.
Performance Benchmarks
Single Page Performance (https://supabase.com with JavaScript):
Tool | Time | Browser Management | Architecture | Resource Usage |
---|---|---|---|---|
Selenium | 4.08s | Local Chrome | Python sequential | High CPU/Memory |
Supacrawler | 1.37s | Cloud managed | Go concurrent | Zero local |
Supacrawler is 3.0x faster despite identical JavaScript rendering.
Multi-Page Crawling Performance:
Test Type | Supacrawler | Selenium | Performance Gain |
---|---|---|---|
Single Page | 1.37s | 4.08s | 3.0x faster |
10 Pages | 2.05s (0.20s/page) | 42.11s (4.21s/page) | 20.6x faster |
50 Pages (avg) | 0.77s/page | 6.02s/page | 7.8x faster |
Large-Scale Testing (50 pages per site):
Website | Selenium | Supacrawler | Performance Gain |
---|---|---|---|
supabase.com | 4.83s/page | 0.73s/page | 6.7x faster |
docs.python.org | 4.13s/page | 0.83s/page | 5.0x faster |
ai.google.dev | 9.11s/page | 0.74s/page | 12.2x faster |
Technical Architecture Comparison
Selenium Sequential Processing:
# One URL at a time - sequential bottleneck
for url in urls:
driver.get(url) # Block until complete
extract_data() # Process sequentially
# Move to next URL
Supacrawler Go Streaming:
// Concurrent worker pool with goroutines
maxWorkers := 10 // Dynamic based on workload
for i := 0; i < maxWorkers; i++ {
go worker() // Parallel processing
}
// Stream results as they complete
Performance Advantages:
- Go Concurrency: Goroutines vs Python sequential execution
- Streaming Architecture: Process results as they arrive vs batch processing
- Memory Efficiency: Go's optimized memory model vs Python/Chrome overhead
- Infrastructure: Managed cloud browsers vs local browser management
The Content Quality Trade-off
Selenium Raw Output:
Supabase | The Postgres Development Platform. Product Developers
Solutions Pricing Docs Blog 88.3K Sign in Start your project...
Supacrawler LLM-Ready Output:
# Build in a weekend, Scale to millions
Supabase is the Postgres development platform.
Start your project with a Postgres database, Authentication...
Supacrawler automatically removes navigation, ads, and boilerplate while preserving structured content in clean markdown format - faster than Selenium while delivering higher data quality.
Use Cases
Task | Selenium | Supacrawler |
---|---|---|
UI Testing | ✅ Excellent | ❌ Not designed for this |
Form Interactions | ✅ Full control | ❌ Not supported |
Web Scraping | ⚠️ Complex setup | ✅ Purpose-built |
LLM Data Extraction | ⚠️ Raw HTML output | ✅ Clean markdown |
JavaScript Sites | ✅ Full support | ✅ Optimized rendering |
Browser Management | ❌ Manual setup required | ✅ Zero maintenance |
Scalability | ⚠️ Resource intensive | ✅ Auto-scaling |
Performance | ⚠️ Sequential bottleneck | ✅ Concurrent processing |
Setup Complexity
Selenium Setup:
- Install browser drivers
- Manage Chrome/Firefox versions
- Configure headless options
- Handle browser crashes
- Implement retry logic
- Scale infrastructure
Supacrawler Setup:
- Get API key
pip install supacrawler
- Start scraping
Getting Started
Selenium: Install drivers → Configure browsers → Write retry logic → Handle crashes → Scale infrastructure → Clean data manually
Supacrawler: Get API key → pip install supacrawler
→ Start getting clean data immediately
See detailed benchmarks: Supacrawler vs Selenium Performance Analysis